![]() |
| Photo from Farm Services Adminstration |
I have a
neighbor who reads a lot of history books. I have always suspected
that he only reads them so that he can impress dinner guests with the
newest “truth” he has discovered in the pages. Usually, it is
enough to just let him go on about whatever he is reading, but every
once in a while his evening lecture deserves some discussion that
goes beyond his selected text. We all know, and try to avoid, someone
who reads a book, a magazine article or visits a website and
immediately awards themselves an advanced degree on the subject, but
their stories are still important when they are balanced by multiple
perspectives. Admittedly, my bias for avoiding that single version of
the historical record motivates my thinking, so when he hijacked the
dinner conversation to lecture on his current reading about the
ancient Egyptian library in Alexandria,
his text moved right into those ideas that make Story
Chip so important.
The book that he read seemed to praise
this ancient effort of the Pharaoh Ptolemy to assemble both the
knowledge and scholarship of the Mediterranean in much the way that
the late Carl Sagan did in his Cosmos
series when he said, “Books break the shackles of time, proof that
humans can work magic.” A library, or archive of stories, achieves
magic by storing and sharing the collected wisdom of a culture, but
there is also a danger because each library has an editor who decides
what is collected and what is left out. Sagan was keenly aware of
this failing of knowledge as well:
One of the saddest lessons of history is this: If we've been bamboozled long enough, we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle. We're no longer interested in finding out the truth. The bamboozle has captured us. It is simply too painful to acknowledge -- even to ourselves -- that we've been so credulous. (So the old bamboozles tend to persist as the new bamboozles rise.)
At dinner that night, I took on the
bamboozle. As much as the library at Alexandria represented a quantum
leap in research and preservation of knowledge, it also was the first
salvo in the battle for the minds of men; books that were included in
the library versus the thinking that was excluded. I pointed out that
Alexandria could also be seen as the world's first bureaucracy
perpetuating itself by deciding what was truth and deciding who would
get access the truth that had been assembled there. Oral traditions
were brought under the control of the bamboozlers. I pointed out that
the Greeks were the first book burners, destroying the work of
Democritus and condemning Socrates to death for his thinking. The
cradle of civilization was also the cradle of censorship and
controlling truth by regulating media of communication.
Well, that certainly led to a lively
conversation at dinner. Unfortunately my neighbor had never heard of
Harold
Innis and apparently had missed the Cosmos series and became
strangely quiet while the rest of us talked about the never ending
conflict between bureaucrats, censors, bamboozlers and oral
traditions. Innis and Sagan both recognized the importance of
continual research to improving the human condition. Innis expressed
his profound concern for monopolies of information and the role that
oral traditions played in preventing them. Or, story telling is
important.
The next time you are sitting through a
monologue from a someone who has just finished reading or watching a
single perspective, you can do a face plant in the vichyssoise, or
you might try to share some additional stories that broaden the
conversation. You might find that everyone at the table starts to
take a role in the conversation, and you might also find that the
bamboozler becomes much quieter.

No comments:
Post a Comment